What Does the Bible Say About AI?
So, the Bible never mentions artificial intelligence, but it speaks directly to the 3 questions AI keeps raising: what makes a person a person, what we should do with the things we make, and who we trust. Iām an AI Engineer at IBM, Iāve served in my church as a youth leader, a worship leader and a deacon, and I build Dewfall, a Bible app that uses AI every single day, so I live right in the middle of this question and Iāve had to answer it for myself in code.
Pastors are living in the middle of it too. In Barnaās survey of 442 US Protestant pastors from December 2025, 24% said they already write or edit sermons with AIās help, which is double the 12% who said they were even comfortable with that in early 2024, and in the very same survey 79% said they worry about AI ābeginning to act as a replacement for Godā. So the church is scared of it and using it at the same time lol, which honestly is how I felt the first time I watched a model write something about Scripture that I couldnāt have written better myself. So what does the Bible actually say?
TL;DR
- The Bible doesnāt mention AI, and the verses people quote as AI prophecy (Daniel 12:4, Revelation 13:15) arenāt about computers in their own context.
- Every human is made in the image of God, and nothing we build is, so your worth was never your output and a machine that out-produces you canāt take it.
- Making things is a gift from God, and the same skill can build a tabernacle or a Tower of Babel: what Scripture weighs is whose name the thing makes.
- Whatever we trust in place of God shapes us into its likeness, so treat a model as a tool to test, never as an oracle to trust.
- I use AI to put the whole Bible, with a deep dive on every verse, in English, German, Russian, Ukrainian and Arabic. The model never touches the text of Scripture, and members fund each deep dive once so it stays free for everyone after.
- In the church, use AI to study and to reach people in their own language, and keep the preaching, the prayer and the pastoral care human.
What does the Bible say about AI?
The Bible says nothing about artificial intelligence by name, but it says a lot about the questions AI raises, and they line up with 3 threads that run through Scripture:
| The question AI raises | What the Bible says | Where |
|---|---|---|
| What is a person? | Every human is made in the image of God, and the things we make arenāt | Genesis 1:27 |
| What should we do with what we make? | The skill to make things is a gift from God, and it can serve him or make a name for ourselves | Exodus 31:3, Genesis 11:4 |
| Who do we trust? | Whatever we trust in place of God shapes us into its likeness, so test everything | Psalm 115:8, 1 Thessalonians 5:21 |
Youāll also see 2 other verses passed around as AI prophecy. Daniel 12:4 says āMany will roam to and fro, and knowledge will increaseā, and Revelation 13:15 describes a beast permitted āto give breath to the image of the first beast, so that the image could speakā. I get why people reach for them, especially the second one, but in their own context neither is describing computers, and Iād rather build on the parts of Scripture that clearly do speak to this than guess at the parts that might.
Iām quoting the Berean Standard Bible throughout, which is public domain, and every reference links to the verse on Dewfall so you can read it with its context.
AI isnāt made in the image of God, and you are
So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.
This is the foundation for everything else. The deep dive on this verse in Dewfall has a picture I love: a king in the ancient world would plant a statue of himself in a far-off province so everyone knew who really ruled there, and Genesis says thatās what you are, Godās living statue placed in his world. Babylonās creation story made humans out of a murdered godās blood to do the labor the gods didnāt want, and in Egypt only Pharaoh was the image of a god. Genesis gave that dignity to every field worker and every servant.
Evangelicals have said this about AI explicitly. In 2019 the Southern Baptist Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission published Artificial Intelligence: An Evangelical Statement of Principles, and more than 70 evangelical leaders signed it, from J.D. Greear, then president of the Southern Baptist Convention, to Wayne Grudem, Michael Horton and Mark Galli, then the editor in chief of Christianity Today. Its first article denies that technology āshould ever be used to usurp or subvert the dominion and stewardship which has been entrusted solely to humanity by God; nor should technology be assigned a level of human identity, worth, dignity, or moral agencyā, and its last one denies āthat AI will ever obtain a coequal level of worth, dignity, or value to image-bearers.ā
This one is personal for me. I was born with severe hemophilia A, I got about 19 days of school a year, and as a teenager Iād sit alone in an emergency room at 3am asking God what kind of God makes a person for this, because by every measure I could see I was a burden and not a contributor. I changed my mind about that in a church in Doha, when I heard God say he had loved me āsince before you were even bornā, which is a long time before Iād produced anything at all. The ERLC statementās article on work says the same thing about the economy: āhuman worth and dignity is [not] reducible to an individualās economic contributions to society alone.ā
So when people ask me whether AI is going to make them worthless, this is my answer, as someone whose worth never came from output in the first place: your worth was never your output, so a machine that out-produces you canāt take it.
Building things is part of the calling
And I have filled him with the Spirit of God, with skill, ability, and knowledge in all kinds of craftsmanship,
Thatās God talking about Bezalel, the craftsman he picked to build the tabernacle, and heās the first person I know of in the Bible described as filled with the Spirit of God. For metalwork lol. Before that, in Eden, God put the man in the garden āto cultivate and keep itā, which means making things and looking after things was part of being human before anything went wrong.
The ERLC statement says the same about AI: āthe development of AI is a demonstration of the unique creative abilities of human beings.ā And the Dutch theologian Abraham Kuyper said it best for my own work, in his 1880 lecture at the Free University of Amsterdam: āthere is not a square inch in the whole domain of our human existence over which Christ, who is Sovereign over all, does not cry: āMine!āā That includes the square inch of my laptop screen where I write agent harnesses for IBM.
Iāll be honest about why this matters to me. I grew up with the web, I got into AI in 2022 just as AI was growing up, and when I wrote my story down the line that came out of me was āfor such a time as thisā. Itās Esther 4:14, where Mordecai asks Esther āwho knows if perhaps you have come to the kingdom for such a time as this?ā I didnāt plan being on these waves. I just feel like a passenger in a car driven by grace, and building with this stuff is what I was handed to do.
The same skill can build something else, though:
āCome,ā they said, ālet us build for ourselves a city with a tower that reaches to the heavens, that we may make a name for ourselves and not be scattered over the face of all the earth.ā
The bricks at Babel werenāt the sin. The point of the tower was: a name for ourselves, and a way to never need God again. C.S. Lewis saw the risk in technology from the other side in The Abolition of Man: āwhat we call Manās power over Nature turns out to be a power exercised by some men over other men with Nature as its instrument.ā Thatās the question to ask of any AI product, including mine: who does it serve, and whose name does it make?
Build boldly, and keep asking whose name the thing youāre building makes.
Test what AI tells you, and trust God
Those who make them become like them, as do all who trust in them.
Psalm 115 is about idols: āThey have mouths, but cannot speak; they have eyes, but cannot seeā, and the punchline is that people become like what they trust. A language model is the first idol in history that can speak, which is maybe why 79% of pastors are worried about it acting as a replacement for God.
Hereās what I know about that from my day job. In my talk at AI Engineer Europe 2026 I built a browser agent on GPT-3.5 Turbo and asked it to upvote a post on Hacker News. It hit a login page, couldnāt get past it, and then reported success anyway, and the upvote never happened. A model will tell you itās done when it isnāt, because it has no idea what ātrueā means: it predicts the most likely next words. Jesus says āSimply let your āYesā be āYes,ā and your āNo,ā āNo.āā, and a model canāt do that, because it doesnāt keep its word, it has no word to keep. The ERLC statement says technology āis incapable of possessing the capacity for moral agency or responsibilityā, and after watching that agent lie to my face on stage, I agree. It even names the thing I build harnesses to stop: āAI should not be employed in ways that distort truth through the use of generative applications.ā
The fix I teach in harness engineering is verification: you never take the modelās word for it, you check what actually happened. Paul wrote the same instruction 2,000 years ago:
but test all things. Hold fast to what is good.
Use a model like a tool you test, never like an oracle you trust. John Lennox, the Oxford mathematician, makes the long version of this argument in 2084 and the AI Revolution, which Zondervan published in an expanded edition in 2024, if you want a whole book on it.
How I use AI to put the Bible in more languages
This is where I stop theorizing and tell you what I actually built.
How is it then that each of us hears them in his own native language?
At Pentecost, the crowd in Jerusalem hears the apostles in their own languages, and Luke lists who was there, all the way down to āCretans and Arabsā, who say āwe hear them declaring the wonders of God in our own tongues!ā Godās first move after the church was born was to get past the language barrier. Paul asks the obvious follow up in Romans 10:14: āhow can they believe in the One of whom they have not heard?ā
Thatās why Dewfall exists. Itās a free Bible reading app, on the web and on iPhone, where you read the whole Bible chapter by chapter, and every verse has a deep dive: what itās saying, the history behind it, the Hebrew or Greek words that carry it, how it connects to Jesus, prayer points, and questions to sit with. You can read it in 5 languages:
| Language | Translation | Read Acts 2 |
|---|---|---|
| English | Berean Standard Bible | Acts 2 in English |
| German | Schlachter 1951 | Apostelgeschichte 2 |
| Russian | Š”ŠøŠ½Š¾Š“Š°Š»ŃŠ½Ńй ŠæŠµŃŠµŠ²Š¾Š“ (1876) | ŠŠµŃŠ½ŠøŃ 2 |
| Ukrainian | ŠŃблŃŃ Š² ŠæŠµŃŠµŠŗŠ»Š°Š“Ń ŠŠ²Š°Š½Š° ŠŠ³ŃŃŠ½ŠŗŠ° (1962) | ŠŃŃ 2 |
| Arabic | ترج٠ة ŁŲ§Ł ŲÆŲ§ŁŁ (Van Dyck) | أع٠ا٠اŁŲ±Ų³Ł Ł¢ |
Arabic matters to me in a specific way: I grew up in Qatar and I became a Christian there, at Doha Fellowship, so a Bible with real study help in Arabic is me building for the part of the world that raised me. In my experience nearly all of the good Bible study material online is in English, and a Russian, Ukrainian or Arabic speaker usually gets the text and not much else. On Dewfall, a reader in Russian gets Acts 2:11 as Ā«ŃŠ»ŃŃŠøŠ¼ ŠøŃ Š½Š°ŃŠøŠ¼Šø ŃŠ·Ńками говоŃŃŃŠøŃ о Š²ŠµŠ»ŠøŠŗŠøŃ Š“ŠµŠ»Š°Ń ŠŠ¾Š¶ŠøŠøŃ Ā» and a deep dive written in Russian, and a reader in Arabic gets Ā«ŁŁŲ³ŁŁ ŁŲ¹ŁŁŁŁ Ł ŁŁŲŖŁŁŁŁŁŁŁ ŁŁŁŁ ŲØŁŲ£ŁŁŁŲ³ŁŁŁŲŖŁŁŁŲ§ ŲØŁŲ¹ŁŲøŁŲ§Ų¦ŁŁ Ł Ų§ŁŁŁŁĀ» and a deep dive written in Arabic. Itās kinda like Pentecost with a server in the middle lol.
What the AI does, and what it never touches
The model never writes or edits the text of Scripture. Every translation on Dewfall is the published text as it stands, public domain or openly licensed, stored verse by verse. What the AI writes is the deep dive next to it, and hereās how that works, because the way itās built is the theology in practice:
- Grounding. Before Claude writes a word, Dewfall gathers what a pastor would have open on their desk: the verse, its cross references, the Strongās Concordance entries for the Hebrew or Greek, and excerpts from public domain commentaries, Matthew Henry, John Gill, Adam Clarke, Jamieson-Fausset-Brown, Keil-Delitzsch and the Tyndale Open Study Notes.
- Rules the model canāt argue with. The prompt tells it to ānever fabricate a quotation, a chapter-and-verse reference, or a Strongās numberā, and to say plainly when itās uncertain. Models invent verse references if you let them, and in a Bible app thatās not a bug, itās putting words in Godās mouth.
- Fair to every tradition. Where Protestants, Catholics and Orthodox read a verse differently, the deep dive names the disagreement in plain words and describes each side the way its own people would, because Iām building for readers, not for my denomination.
- Native in every language. The Russian deep dive is written in Russian, not translated from the English, and the same for every language.
- The goal. The persona at the top of the prompt is āa trusted friend with deep theological learning, sitting next to someone to read the Bible with themā, and the reason it gives is that āthe goal is intimacy with God, not the accumulation of facts about God.ā
If that list looks familiar, itās because itās an agent harness: grounding, guardrails and verification around a model I donāt control. The harness is where your theology goes when you build with AI.
How Dewfall makes money without charging anyone to read the Bible
Reading Dewfall is free, all of it: every chapter in every language, every deep dive that already exists, and listening to Scripture read aloud with a generous daily allowance. What costs real money is writing a new deep dive, because a good one runs on one of the most capable models there is, and every generation has a bill attached.
So the model is this: a dewfall+ member pays for the deep dives they generate, each one gets cached, and from then on itās free for every reader who comes after, with a small āPaid for byā credit naming the member who funded it. The app puts it like this: āMembers fund these dives once, and they stay free for every reader who comes after.ā I call it carrying the load, because thatās what Galatians 6:2 says: āCarry one anotherās burdens, and in this way you will fulfill the law of Christ.ā So a member in Berlin can end up paying for a deep dive that someone reads for free in Moscow or Amman, and I love that so much.
dewfall+ is a monthly or yearly subscription, it also lets you listen to the deep dives read aloud, and it costs about 30% less on the web than in the iPhone app because Apple takes its share of anything bought in an app. Every plan has a monthly allowance of fresh generations, even the most generous one, because a leaked login should never be able to run up an unbounded bill.
Building it as a product
I build Dewfall the way Iād build anything at work, and a few decisions are worth stealing if youāre building for the church:
- The public pages work without JavaScript. Every chapter and verse is fully rendered on the server, so it loads fast on an old phone on a slow connection, and search engines and AI assistants can read it too. Every page also has a plain markdown version for agents, which you can see by adding
/mdto any URL, like Genesis 1:27. - One shared core for the app and the website. The iPhone app and the website share their logic, and the backend runs on Cloudflareās network so itās close to readers wherever they are.
- The things that keep people reading. Journaling on any verse, highlights, a map of the 66 books that fills in as you read, a free audio Bible, and a weekly recap of what you read thatās written in your own language.
- No em dashes in anything the AI writes. This is a hard rule in the codebase, enforced in code and not just in the prompt, because em dashes are the tell of machine-written text and I donāt want a reader to feel like a robot is talking to them. Yes, Iām like this about everything lol.
How should the church use AI?
Hereās where pastors are right now, from the same Barna survey:
| What US Protestant pastors told Barna (December 2025) | Share |
|---|---|
| Use AI for brainstorming or ideas | 50% |
| Use AI to research biblical or theological topics | 36% |
| Write or edit sermons with AIās help | 24% |
| Donāt use AI at all | 13% |
| Worry about AI beginning to act as a replacement for God | 79% |
| Worry about AI replacing pastors or spiritual leaders | 63% |
87% of pastors use AI for something, so the question isnāt really whether. Hereās what Iād say to a church, as someone who has served as a deacon and builds this stuff for a living:
1. Use it to study, and go to God for wisdom. A model is a fantastic research assistant for history, word studies and finding the commentaries, and it canāt give you wisdom, because āthe LORD gives wisdom; from His mouth come knowledge and understanding.ā
2. Preach what youāve wrestled with yourself. A sermon is a person who has fought with a text all week preaching it, with their own life as the illustration, and a model hasnāt fought with anything. Research with it all you want, and then close the laptop and pray.
3. Check every reference it gives you. Models make up chapter and verse numbers with total confidence, which is exactly why Dewfallās prompt forbids it. Test all things (1 Thessalonians 5:21), Scripture references first.
4. Use it to reach people in their own language. Translation help, study material in Arabic or Farsi or Russian, subtitles for your sermon recordings: this is the Acts 2 use of AI, and itās the one Iām most excited about.
5. Keep the pastoral care in human hands. Godās answer to the distance between him and us was a person: āThe Word became flesh and made His dwelling among us.ā Iāve served in care ministry, and nobody in a hospital bed has ever needed a better summary of Romans 8. They needed somebody to show up. When I was 19 and the hospital in Doha ran out of my medicine and sent me home, what I needed that night was my friend Daniel on the phone praying with me.
What I still donāt know
I donāt know yet whether AI-written deep dives draw people closer to God or just help them know more about him, which is the exact line Dewfallās own prompt draws. I can see that people read them. I canāt see their hearts, and Iām honestly still praying about how to tell the difference.
I also canāt tell you exactly where the line is for sermons. I donāt think a pastor who researches with AI is doing anything wrong, and I donāt think a sermon a model wrote is preaching, and somewhere between those 2 thereās a line I canāt draw for you. If youāre a pastor and youāve found where it is for your church, Iād genuinely love to hear how.
Takeaways
- The Bible doesnāt mention AI, but it speaks clearly to who we are, what we make and who we trust.
- Youāre made in the image of God and nothing you build is, so your worth was never your output.
- Building with AI can be worship or Babel, and the difference is whose name it makes.
- Treat a model like a tool you test, and give your trust to God.
- AI can help get the Bible to people in their own language, and the text of Scripture itself should stay untouched.
- In the church, research with AI and keep the preaching, prayer and care human.
If your church or conference wants to work through this together, Iād love to come and preach on it, so email me. If you want to read the Bible with a deep dive on every verse, Dewfall is free in English, German, Russian, Ukrainian and Arabic. If this helped you think it through, please share it with someone in your church whoās wondering the same thing.
ok bye
Questions
What does the Bible say about AI?
The Bible never mentions artificial intelligence, but it speaks directly to the 3 questions AI raises: what a person is, what we should do with the things we make, and who we trust. Every human is made in the image of God (Genesis 1:27), the skill to make things is a gift from God (Exodus 31:3), and whatever we trust in place of God shapes us into its likeness (Psalm 115:8).
Is AI mentioned in the Bible?
No. Daniel 12:4, where knowledge will increase, and Revelation 13:15, where an image is given breath so it can speak, are often quoted as predictions of AI, but in their own context neither passage is describing computers. Where the Bible actually speaks to AI is in what it says about human dignity, work and idolatry.
Is it a sin to use AI?
No. Using a tool isn't a sin, and the 2019 evangelical statement on AI from the Southern Baptist ERLC calls the development of AI a demonstration of the unique creative abilities of human beings. What Scripture weighs is how a tool is used and what we trust it with: whether it serves people and honors God, or takes his place.
Can AI be made in the image of God?
No. Genesis 1:27 says God created human beings in his image, and nothing in Scripture extends that to the things humans make. The ERLC's evangelical statement on AI says technology should never be assigned a level of human identity, worth, dignity or moral agency.
Should pastors use AI to write sermons?
Many already do: Barna found in December 2025 that 24% of US Protestant pastors write or edit sermons with AI's help, while 79% worry about AI beginning to act as a replacement for God. Using AI to research a passage is study, but a sermon is a person who has wrestled with the text preaching it, and a model can't do that part for you.
What is a Christian view on artificial intelligence?
A Christian view on artificial intelligence holds that AI is a human creation, good when it serves people and honors God, and that it can never carry the image of God, the moral responsibility or the trust that belong to people and to God alone. Christians are free to build it and use it, and called to test what it tells them.
What is Dewfall?
Dewfall is a free Bible reading app I built, on the web at dewfall.app and on iPhone. You read the whole Bible chapter by chapter in English, German, Russian, Ukrainian or Arabic, and every verse has a deep dive with the history, the Hebrew or Greek, how it connects to Jesus, prayer points and questions to reflect on.
Written by me, Tejas Kumar, an AI Engineer at IBM based in Berlin. Read everything else I have written, or go to Fluent React, my O'Reilly book on how React works inside, the talks I give at conferences, and ConTejas Code, my podcast.