What Does the Bible Say About AI?
So, the Bible never mentions artificial intelligence, but it speaks directly to the 3 questions AI keeps raising: what makes a person a person, what we should do with the things we make and who we trust. Iām an AI Engineer at IBM. Iāve served in my church as a youth leader, a worship leader and a deacon. I also build Dewfall, a Bible app that uses AI every single day, so I live right in the middle of this question and Iāve had to answer it for myself in code.
Pastors are living in the middle of it too. In Barnaās survey of 442 US Protestant pastors from December 2025, 24% said they already write or edit sermons with AIās help, which is double the 12% who said they were even comfortable with that in early 2024, and in the very same survey 79% said they worry about AI ābeginning to act as a replacement for Godā. So the church is scared of it and using it at the same time lol, which honestly is how I felt the first time I watched a model write something about Scripture that I couldnāt have written better myself. So what does the Bible actually say?
What does the Bible say about AI?
The Bible says nothing about artificial intelligence by name, but it says a lot about the questions AI raises. They line up with 3 threads that run through Scripture:
| The question AI raises | What the Bible says | Where |
|---|---|---|
| What is a person? | Every human is made in the image of God. The things we make arenāt. | Genesis 1:27 |
| What should we do with what we make? | The skill to make things is a gift from God, and it can serve him or make a name for ourselves | Exodus 31:3, Genesis 11:4 |
| Who do we trust? | Whatever we trust in place of God shapes us into its likeness, so test everything | Psalm 115:8, 1 Thessalonians 5:21 |
Youāll also see 2 other verses passed around as AI prophecy. Daniel 12:4 says āMany will roam to and fro, and knowledge will increaseā, and Revelation 13:15 describes a beast permitted āto give breath to the image of the first beast, so that the image could speakā. I get why people reach for them, especially the second one, but read them in context and neither one is about computers.
Iām quoting the Berean Standard Bible throughout, which is public domain. Every reference links to the verse on Dewfall so you can read it with its context.
AI isnāt made in the image of God. You are.
So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.
The deep dive on this verse in Dewfall has a picture I love: a king in the ancient world would plant a statue of himself in a far-off province so everyone knew who really ruled there. Genesis says thatās what you are: Godās living statue placed in his world. Babylonās creation story made humans out of a murdered godās blood to do the labor the gods didnāt want. In Egypt, only Pharaoh was the image of a god. Genesis gave that dignity to every field worker and every servant.
Evangelicals have said this about AI explicitly. In 2019 the Southern Baptist Conventionās Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission (ERLC) published Artificial Intelligence: An Evangelical Statement of Principles. More than 70 evangelical leaders signed it, from J.D. Greear, then president of the Southern Baptist Convention, to Wayne Grudem, Michael Horton and Mark Galli, then the editor in chief of Christianity Today. Its first article denies that technology āshould ever be used to usurp or subvert the dominion and stewardship which has been entrusted solely to humanity by God; nor should technology be assigned a level of human identity, worth, dignity, or moral agencyā. Its last one denies āthat AI will ever obtain a coequal level of worth, dignity, or value to image-bearers.ā
I was born with severe hemophilia A and got about 19 days of school a year. As a teenager Iād sit alone in an emergency room at 3am asking God what kind of God makes a person for this. By every measure I could see, I was a burden and not a contributor. I changed my mind about that in a church in Doha, when I heard God say he had loved me āsince before you were even bornā, which is a long time before Iād produced anything at all. The ERLC statementās article on work says the same thing about the economy: āhuman worth and dignity is [not] reducible to an individualās economic contributions to society alone.ā
So when people ask me whether AI is going to make them worthless, this is my answer, as someone whose worth never came from output in the first place: your worth was never your output, so a machine that out-produces you canāt take it.
Building things is part of the calling
And I have filled him with the Spirit of God, with skill, ability, and knowledge in all kinds of craftsmanship,
Thatās God talking about Bezalel, the craftsman he picked to build the tabernacle, and heās the first person I know of in the Bible described as filled with the Spirit of God. For metalwork. Before that, in Eden, God put the man in the garden āto cultivate and keep itā, which means making things and looking after things was part of being human before anything went wrong.
The ERLC statement says the same about AI: āthe development of AI is a demonstration of the unique creative abilities of human beings.ā And the Dutch theologian Abraham Kuyper said it best for my own work, in his 1880 lecture at the Free University of Amsterdam: āthere is not a square inch in the whole domain of our human existence over which Christ, who is Sovereign over all, does not cry: āMine!āā That includes the square inch of my laptop screen where I write agent harnesses for IBM.
I grew up with the web and got into AI in 2022 just as AI was growing up. When I wrote my story down, the line that came out of me was āfor such a time as thisā. Itās Esther 4:14, where Mordecai asks Esther āwho knows if perhaps you have come to the kingdom for such a time as this?ā I didnāt plan being on these waves. I just feel like a passenger in a car driven by grace. Building with this stuff is what I was handed to do.
The same skill can build something else, though:
āCome,ā they said, ālet us build for ourselves a city with a tower that reaches to the heavens, that we may make a name for ourselves and not be scattered over the face of all the earth.ā
The bricks at Babel werenāt the sin. The point of the tower was a name for ourselves and a way to never need God again. C.S. Lewis saw the risk in technology from the other side in The Abolition of Man: āwhat we call Manās power over Nature turns out to be a power exercised by some men over other men with Nature as its instrument.ā Thatās the question to ask of any AI product, including mine: who does it serve and whose name does it make?
Build boldly and keep asking whose name the thing youāre building makes.
Test what AI tells you and trust God
Those who make them become like them, as do all who trust in them.
Psalm 115 is about idols: āThey have mouths, but cannot speak; they have eyes, but cannot seeā. The punchline is that people become like what they trust. A language model is the first idol in history that can speak, which is maybe why 79% of pastors are worried about it acting as a replacement for God. When the US government renamed AI āSuper Intelligenceā in 2026, I wrote about why we keep doing this in AI Is Now SI: Super Intelligence Isnāt Superior.
Hereās what I know about that from my day job. In my talk at AI Engineer Europe 2026 I built a browser agent on GPT-3.5 Turbo and asked it to upvote a post on Hacker News. It hit a login page, couldnāt get past it and then reported success anyway. The upvote never happened. A model will tell you itās done when it isnāt. It has no idea what ātrueā means: it predicts the most likely next words. Jesus says āSimply let your āYesā be āYes,ā and your āNo,ā āNo.āā. A model canāt do that: it has no word to keep. The ERLC statement says technology āis incapable of possessing the capacity for moral agency or responsibilityā. After watching that agent lie to my face on stage, I agree. It even names the thing I build harnesses to stop: āAI should not be employed in ways that distort truth through the use of generative applications.ā
In harness engineering I teach verification: you never take the modelās word for it, you check what actually happened. Paul wrote the same instruction 2,000 years ago:
but test all things. Hold fast to what is good.
Test what a model tells you before you trust it. John Lennox, the Oxford mathematician, makes the long version of this argument in 2084 and the AI Revolution, which Zondervan published in an expanded edition in 2024, if you want a whole book on it.
How should the church use AI?
Hereās where pastors are right now, from the same Barna survey:
| What US Protestant pastors told Barna (December 2025) | Share |
|---|---|
| Use AI for brainstorming or ideas | 50% |
| Use AI to research biblical or theological topics | 36% |
| Write or edit sermons with AIās help | 24% |
| Donāt use AI at all | 13% |
| Worry about AI beginning to act as a replacement for God | 79% |
| Worry about AI replacing pastors or spiritual leaders | 63% |
87% of pastors use AI for something, so the question isnāt really whether. Hereās what Iād say to a church, as someone who has served as a deacon and builds this stuff for a living:
1. Use it to study and go to God for wisdom. A model is a fantastic research assistant for history, word studies and finding the commentaries. It canāt give you wisdom: āthe LORD gives wisdom; from His mouth come knowledge and understanding.ā
2. Preach what youāve wrestled with yourself. A sermon is a person who has fought with a text all week preaching it, with their own life as the illustration. A model hasnāt fought with anything. Research with it all you want, then close the laptop and pray.
3. Check every reference it gives you. Models make up chapter and verse numbers with total confidence, which is exactly why Dewfallās prompt forbids it. Test all things (1 Thessalonians 5:21), Scripture references first.
4. Use it to reach people in their own language. Translation help, study material in Arabic or Farsi or Russian, subtitles for your sermon recordings: this is the Acts 2 use of AI.
5. Keep the pastoral care in human hands. Godās answer to the distance between him and us was a person: āThe Word became flesh and made His dwelling among us.ā Iāve served in care ministry. Nobody in a hospital bed has ever needed a better summary of Romans 8. They needed somebody to show up. When I was 19 and the hospital in Doha ran out of my medicine and sent me home, what I needed that night was my friend Daniel on the phone praying with me.
How I use AI to put the Bible in more languages
How is it then that each of us hears them in his own native language?
At Pentecost, the crowd in Jerusalem hears the apostles in their own languages. Luke lists who was there, all the way down to āCretans and Arabsā, who say āwe hear them declaring the wonders of God in our own tongues!ā Godās first move after the church was born was to get past the language barrier. Paul asks the obvious follow up in Romans 10:14: āhow can they believe in the One of whom they have not heard?ā
Thatās why Dewfall exists. Itās a free Bible reading app, on the web and on iPhone, where you read the whole Bible chapter by chapter, and every verse has a deep dive: what itās saying, the history behind it, the Hebrew or Greek words that carry it, how it connects to Jesus, prayer points, and questions to think about. You can read it in 5 languages:
| Language | Translation | Read Acts 2 |
|---|---|---|
| English | Berean Standard Bible | Acts 2 in English |
| German | Schlachter 1951 | Apostelgeschichte 2 |
| Russian | Š”ŠøŠ½Š¾Š“Š°Š»ŃŠ½Ńй ŠæŠµŃŠµŠ²Š¾Š“ (1876) | ŠŠµŃŠ½ŠøŃ 2 |
| Ukrainian | ŠŃблŃŃ Š² ŠæŠµŃŠµŠŗŠ»Š°Š“Ń ŠŠ²Š°Š½Š° ŠŠ³ŃŃŠ½ŠŗŠ° (1962) | ŠŃŃ 2 |
| Arabic | ترج٠ة ŁŲ§Ł ŲÆŲ§ŁŁ (Van Dyck) | أع٠ا٠اŁŲ±Ų³Ł Ł¢ |
Arabic matters to me in a specific way: I grew up in Qatar and I became a Christian there, at Doha Fellowship so a Bible with real study help in Arabic is me building for the part of the world that raised me. In my experience nearly all of the good Bible study material online is in English. A Russian, Ukrainian or Arabic speaker usually gets the text and not much else. On Dewfall, a reader in Russian gets Acts 2:11 as Ā«ŃŠ»ŃŃŠøŠ¼ ŠøŃ Š½Š°ŃŠøŠ¼Šø ŃŠ·Ńками говоŃŃŃŠøŃ о Š²ŠµŠ»ŠøŠŗŠøŃ Š“ŠµŠ»Š°Ń ŠŠ¾Š¶ŠøŠøŃ Ā» and a deep dive written in Russian. A reader in Arabic gets Ā«ŁŁŲ³ŁŁ ŁŲ¹ŁŁŁŁ Ł ŁŁŲŖŁŁŁŁŁŁŁ ŁŁŁŁ ŲØŁŲ£ŁŁŁŲ³ŁŁŁŲŖŁŁŁŲ§ ŲØŁŲ¹ŁŲøŁŲ§Ų¦ŁŁ Ł Ų§ŁŁŁŁĀ» and a deep dive written in Arabic. Itās kinda like Pentecost with a server in the middle.
What the AI does and what it never touches
The model never writes or edits the text of Scripture. Every translation on Dewfall is the published text as it stands, public domain or openly licensed, stored verse by verse. What the AI writes is the deep dive next to it, in 5 steps:
- Grounding. Before Claude writes a word, Dewfall gathers what a pastor would have open on their desk: the verse, its cross references, the Strongās Concordance entries for the Hebrew or Greek, and excerpts from public domain commentaries: Matthew Henry, John Gill, Adam Clarke, Jamieson-Fausset-Brown, Keil-Delitzsch and the Tyndale Open Study Notes.
- Rules the model canāt argue with. The prompt tells it to ānever fabricate a quotation, a chapter-and-verse reference, or a Strongās numberā, and to say plainly when itās uncertain. Models invent verse references if you let them, and in a Bible app thatās putting words in Godās mouth.
- Fair to every tradition. Where Protestants, Catholics and Orthodox read a verse differently, the deep dive names the disagreement in plain words and describes each side the way its own people would. Iām building for readers, not for my denomination.
- Native in every language. The Russian deep dive is written in Russian, not translated from the English, and the same for every language.
- The goal. The persona at the top of the prompt is āa trusted friend with deep theological learning, sitting next to someone to read the Bible with themā. The reason it gives is that āthe goal is intimacy with God, not the accumulation of facts about God.ā
If that list looks familiar, itās because itās an agent harness: grounding, guardrails and verification around a model I donāt control. The harness is where your theology goes when you build with AI.
How Dewfall makes money without charging anyone to read the Bible
Reading Dewfall is free, all of it: every chapter in every language, every deep dive that already exists and listening to Scripture read aloud with a generous daily allowance. What costs real money is writing a new deep dive. A good one runs on one of the most capable models there is, so every generation has a bill attached.
A dewfall+ member pays for the deep dives they generate and each one gets cached. From then on itās free for every reader who comes after, with a small āPaid for byā credit naming the member who funded it. The app puts it like this: āMembers fund these dives once, and they stay free for every reader who comes after.ā I call it carrying the load, after Galatians 6:2: āCarry one anotherās burdens, and in this way you will fulfill the law of Christ.ā So a member in Berlin can end up paying for a deep dive that someone reads for free in Moscow or Amman. I love that so much.
dewfall+ is a monthly or yearly subscription, it also lets you listen to the deep dives read aloud, and it costs about 30% less on the web than in the iPhone app because Apple takes its share of anything bought in an app. Every plan has a monthly allowance of fresh generations, even the most generous one. A leaked login should never be able to run up an unbounded bill.
Building it as a product
I build Dewfall the way Iād build anything at work. Here are a few decisions you can steal if youāre building for the church:
- The public pages work without JavaScript. Every chapter and verse is fully rendered on the server, so it loads fast on an old phone on a slow connection, and search engines and AI assistants can read it too. Every page also has a plain markdown version for agents, which you can see by adding
/mdto any URL, like Genesis 1:27. - One shared core for the app and the website. The iPhone app and the website share their logic. The backend runs on Cloudflareās network so itās close to readers wherever they are.
- The things that keep people reading. Journaling on any verse, highlights, a map of the 66 books that fills in as you read, a free audio Bible and a weekly recap of what you read thatās written in your own language.
- No em dashes in anything the AI writes. This is a hard rule in the codebase, enforced in code and not just in the prompt. Em dashes give machine-written text away and I donāt want a reader to feel like a robot is talking to them. Yes, Iām like this about everything.
Where Iām still praying it through
I donāt know yet whether AI-written deep dives draw people closer to God or just help them know more about him, which is the exact line Dewfallās own prompt draws. I can see that people read them. I canāt see their hearts. Iām honestly still praying about how to tell the difference.
I also canāt tell you exactly where the line is for sermons. I donāt think a pastor who researches with AI is doing anything wrong. I also donāt think a sermon a model wrote is preaching. Somewhere between those 2 thereās a line I canāt draw for you. If youāre a pastor and youāve found where it is for your church, Iād love to hear how.
If your church or conference wants to work through this together, Iād love to come and preach on it, so email me. And if you want to read the Bible with a deep dive on every verse, Dewfall is free in English, German, Russian, Ukrainian and Arabic.
Grace and peace.
Questions
What does the Bible say about AI?
The Bible never mentions artificial intelligence, but it speaks directly to the 3 questions AI raises: what a person is, what we should do with the things we make, and who we trust. Every human is made in the image of God (Genesis 1:27), the skill to make things is a gift from God (Exodus 31:3), and whatever we trust in place of God shapes us into its likeness (Psalm 115:8).
Is AI mentioned in the Bible?
No. Daniel 12:4, where knowledge will increase, and Revelation 13:15, where an image is given breath so it can speak, are often quoted as predictions of AI, but in their own context neither passage is describing computers. Where the Bible actually speaks to AI is in what it says about human dignity, work and idolatry.
Does the Bible talk about AI?
Not by name and not as a prophecy. What the Bible talks about is what AI forces us to decide: whether a person is more than a machine (Genesis 1:27 says we're made in the image of God), whether making powerful things is good (Exodus 31:3 says the skill is a gift) and what we trust (Psalm 115:8 says we become like whatever we trust). I read those as the Bible's answer on AI. The rest of this post walks through each one.
Is it a sin to use AI?
No. Using a tool isn't a sin, and the 2019 evangelical statement on AI from the Southern Baptist Convention's Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission calls the development of AI a demonstration of the unique creative abilities of human beings. What Scripture weighs is how a tool is used and what we trust it with: whether it serves people and honors God, or takes his place.
Can AI be made in the image of God?
No. Genesis 1:27 says God created human beings in his image, and nothing in Scripture extends that to the things humans make. The 2019 evangelical statement on AI from the Southern Baptist Convention's Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission says technology should never be assigned a level of human identity, worth, dignity or moral agency.
Should pastors use AI to write sermons?
Many already do: Barna found in December 2025 that 24% of US Protestant pastors write or edit sermons with AI's help, while 79% worry about AI beginning to act as a replacement for God. Using AI to research a passage is study, but a sermon is a person who has wrestled with the text preaching it, and a model can't do that part for you.
What is a Christian view on artificial intelligence?
A Christian view on artificial intelligence holds that AI is a human creation, good when it serves people and honors God, and that it can never carry the image of God, the moral responsibility or the trust that belong to people and to God alone. Christians are free to build it and use it, and called to test what it tells them.
What is Dewfall?
Dewfall is a free Bible reading app I built, on the web at dewfall.app and on iPhone. You read the whole Bible chapter by chapter in English, German, Russian, Ukrainian or Arabic, and every verse has a deep dive with the history, the Hebrew or Greek, how it connects to Jesus, prayer points and questions to reflect on.
Written by me, Tejas Kumar, an AI Engineer at IBM based in Berlin. Read everything else I have written, or go to Fluent React, my O'Reilly book on how React works inside, the talks I give at conferences, and ConTejas Code, my podcast.